This year I decided to focus considerable attention on establishing a new flat and making it a homely environment suitable for hosting guests. It’s been less than two months so far and I’ve come a long way and faced plenty of drama. Early in my search for suitable flatmates, my previous flatmate referred her ex, who decided to take the room, yet didn’t actually get in touch with me properly. Within a few weeks there was suddenly a long list of red flags with this person:
- He made the decision to take the room without telling me, instead going through my previous flatmate instead.
- He didn’t reach out to confirm anything, meaning I couldn’t screen him properly.
- He didn’t have a job, couldn’t pay the bond up front.
- In over a month he hasn’t done a single communal chore.
- He often left the front door open.
- He didn’t clean up after himself.
- He claimed not to be antisocial, but he wasn’t really social at all.
- He claimed he could observe things that were going on without asking about it, and this was his justification for not asking questions that normal people do about how to not step on other people’s toes. But twice he helped himself to other people’s things without first asking.
- Twice there was a very strong smell of weed coming from his room.
But really before most of those things emerged, he paid late on the first day and took several days to sign his flatting agreement, despite multiple prompts. A heated conversation about that made it clear to me that he simply didn’t think paying on time was a big deal, and that I was making a fuss over things that would be sorted out anyway.
I was pretty furious about these things and nearly kicked him out on the spot. However, talking to a level-headed friend helped me make an empowered decision rather than an emotionally driven one. I did have one excellent conversation initially with this person and thought he might have something to contribute, and I also did believe that all the drama with payments would be a one-time thing while things were getting set up. Simultaneously, kicking him out immediately was also a good option, because I never would have chosen this person had I gone through interviewing multiple potential flatmates, and I’m sure that I could have easily found someone with less annoying habits and better communication.
In the end, I chose to be open to the possibility of things getting better, settled my grievances, and gave him a chance. The drama with payments was sorted out, except for the fact that he signed his agreement without even putting his details on it. I didn’t pursue this further as it was actually in my favor to not have it signed if we were to ask him to leave, and I was just tired of chasing up a matter that demonstrated pure incompetence and neglect from his side.
Anyhow, more concerning behaviors emerged from him like the smoking weed in the house, complete lack of communal contribution, and the very strong vibe that every time he was in the house he was either in a rush to enter or a rush to leave. My other flatmate and I wanted someone to connect with, and this guy totally wasn’t it. So we ended up asking him to leave, and this too has been problematic because we offered him some lenience in terms of timeframe to vacate.
At the time it was totally unclear to me whether it was better or not to give him a second chance to stay, as his disregard for timely sorting out of finances was a deal-breaker for me. In hindsight, here’s what I’ve learned about this situation about deciding whether it makes sense to accept a deal-breaker.
- The deal-breaker will never change. If you find out very early on that someone doesn’t care about, respect, or value something that is important to you as a requirement, keep in mind that nothing will make them suddenly care about that thing.
- No amount of kindness from your end or gratitude from theirs will change the deal-breaker itself. But other good things might come of it.
- The deal-breaker can only be avoided under perfect conditions. Every other situation can crumble. People can offer false reassurances or pretend to care, but despite even the best of intentions, whenever something goes wrong or things become hard, they will always default to their original state, which is that they didn’t care about this thing in the first place.
- Consider the long-term impact of the missing virtue. Different missing virtues behind the deal-breaker have different degrees of vulnerability in terms of a bad situation getting worse. For example, dishonesty, poor communication, severe addiction, severe mental illness, violence, and stealing are things that are bad and can easily lead to a downward spiral when you try to address any issues arising from it. Some of these will touch every area of a person’s life, and the severity may not be apparent from the get go. When a person lies about small things, maybe most things don’t matter until one thing does, and when you attempt to confront that lie, more lies emerge, and so on. I would actually say that general incompetence, avoidance of responsibility, and even financial hardship also have the potential to spiral. Things that don’t get worse out of time might include habits that you can easily adjust for, or that you get used to eventually.
- Consider how often the deal-breaker thing occurs or might occur. If your answer needs to be “in theory, never again, because I’ve dealt with it once and for all”, consider the possibility that it hasn’t been dealt with perfectly, or that unexpected circumstances might arise and trigger things again. So imagine the deal-breaker thing occurring at least one more time and the cost of it.
- Consider the possibility of having to resign to the deal-breaker. If resolving a deal-breaker was a nightmare the first time, it will still likely be a nightmare if there is a second time. Things might not be easier the second time either, you might not have the resources if you happen to fall sick or some part of your lifestyle becomes unstable. Or maybe what you’ve experienced so far is only the beginning. What would it be like having to resign to the deal-breaker? Is it worth saying no to the whole situation on the basis that the worst case possibility has too high a cost, that it threatens too much of what is important to us?
Summary
When it comes to putting up with deal-breakers, it’s crucial to evaluate whether they can truly be isolated issues that are either one-off or potentially tolerable and never get worse over time. Consider the underlying virtues that are lacking, as this may highlight the potential for struggles in multiple areas that aren’t yet obvious. For example, poor communication, incompetence, poor boundaries, dishonesty, carelessness, or mental illness are likely to cause reoccurring issues in the known deal-breaker pattern, as well as in a growing list of issues that are impossible to foresee at first. Some problems can genuinely be highly specific annoyances or one-offs, but anything featured in this list will generally not be isolated.